COCC Bookstore 1991 in Grandview |
______________
Darla ___, doctorate in psych from Berkeley, ex-radical . . . with . . . a habit of touching you when she's speaking to you, attended my 1 o'clock Fundamentals class on 9/30, and my 12:30 t th Fundamentals class on 10/13. After the Thursday class, we met down the hill at a coffee shop called the West Side Bakery.
When she attended my class, I introduced her and told them who she was, saying, "Now you get to see a real live tense public speaking evaluation." I am very up front with my students about my position in the Biz -- if asked, I tell them my contract says "probationary". I had told my T Th class that Darla would be there -- and boy, did they perform well. On that day I was introducing the Public Speaking in Oregon project (my own idea ....) But the evaluations. I had them write out on a piece of paper the finish of these two sentences: "The in class evaluations were most useful when . . ." "The in-class evaluations were not useful when . . . "* Oh my, but they responded wonderfully! they talked about how the evaluations were best when they were honest and included both good and bad, and not just good. After each comment, I paraphrased. Ah. What a lovely class. Lots of dialogue, lots of concern for the students. They seemed comfortable with me.
During our talk, the biggest advice Darla gave me was to sit down when I lectured -- that when I stood I talked too fast. And that I should also relax, because when I am nervous I look awfully severe.
When I shared this story with my class, I saw Rob, a large blond fellow smiling wikedly. "Yes Rob?" I said. "Nothing," he replied. "Just a short joke." "Yes?" "I thought you were standing up!"
That's how my students treat me. They tease me.
So. Darla seems to think I'm Okay.
________________________
* By "in-class" evaluations I was talking about the oral feedback I used to have students give each other right after a round of speeches was finished. I now have all feedback given in written form for three reasons: 1) a new speaker's quite literal inability to actually hear and process feedback given right after a performance 2) the face-threatening nature of any honest critical practice and my need to keep the speech class a "safe" place 3) student reluctance to criticize other students.
No comments:
Post a Comment